You want your essay written but you don’t know where to turn. You’re worried about whether the companies you’re looking at really are genuine. We can’t speak for anyone else, but we can speak for ourselves. Thousands of students have asked us to “cheap essay help” and we have responded quickly and promptly. We’re precise and accurate in everything we do, and this is part of the reason why students keep coming back to us for more.
Accuracy is the Key for An Essay Writing Help
We take pride in the fact we’re consistent. Too many companies will post their best samples on the website in the hope of snagging a few customers. What these unwitting customers fail to realise is they aren’t consistent.
Check Our Cheap Prices
To make sure we continue to do a good job, we put our writers under constant evaluation. We guarantee you a great essay which will match your ambitions. And this involves a close attention to detail and a good eye.
There’s nothing to feel bad about if you decide to use our write my essay papers. You wouldn’t feel terrible if your teacher gave you a pre-written essay which you learned from. What we’re about is education. We want students to learn from what we do. This is why we always recommend they compare our work with their own.
The lessons they learn from us will last a lifetime. The ability to communicate your thoughts coherently in written form is an essential skill to have at any academic level and in the workplace.
Doing it for You
The average student will spend days and weeks crafting an essay they feel confident in. We do things differently. When you choose our essay writing help services, you’re given a writer who can do what you can do in less than half the time. In a matter of hours they can gather all the necessary resources and start forming an argument.
Take advantage of the rush orders on our website. We can complete assignments in as little as three hours. But this doesn’t impact on the standards we set ourselves. Whether it takes a week or less than 24 hours, you will get the same quality you’ve come to expect from an organisation like us.
Whilst we’re unique in our approach because we actually back up what we say with results, you still might be unsure. If you’re still unsure, we invite you to get in touch with us and have a chat. It’s completely free of charge and we can talk any time of the day or night.
Dilemmas plus emotional conflicts are native to the condition of humans and to life itself. The relationship between professionals (like physicians, counselors, and therapists) and those that they are serving have always been viewed as having particular importance and meaning. In all cases, there is a difference of power, and the person with lesser power assumes that the professional will act in their best interest (American Counseling Association, 2014). Unfortunately, in most cases, this has been found to be untrue. Majority of the dilemmas faced by addiction counselors revolve around ethical issues.
The NAADAC Code of Ethics stipulates that professional alcoholism & drug abuse counselors need to adhere and comply with the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence and justice (National Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors, 2011).
Confidentiality between a counselor and the patient is vital towards the success of the counseling relationship. The patient’s beliefs regarding confidentially shall determine the degree & the type of the information revealed during the counseling session. Addiction counselors are mostly faced with unique ethical circumstances regarding confidentiality because the identified client is usually more than one person. The alcoholism and drug abuse counselor are required to embrace the duty of safeguarding the privacy of the patient and should not disclose confidential information acquired, in teaching, practice, or investigation. However, the counselors are faced with the dilemma of whether to reveal or not to reveal certain information to 3rd parties when there is clear and imminent danger in the life on the patient. A case in point is when the patient is taken to court.
The alcoholism and drug abuse counselors are required by their professional code of conduct not to discriminate their patients based on their ethnicity, religion, gender, or economic condition. However, there are those professionals who are unable to act professionally. This especially applies to those counselors who have a negative perception towards drug addicts. As a result of this, they may be forced to decline to offer their services to such kind of patients.
Informed consent is another important ethical dilemma facing drug addicts’ counselors. Counselors are required to seek the consent of the patient before releasing their information to 3rd parties. Informed consent & confidentiality complement each other. However, there are those instances whereby the consent of the patient is not sought after and which go against the ethics or the principle of Informed Consent plus it violates the rights of the patient (Scott, 2010). A case in point when a counselor is asked to appear before the court to give their verdict or provide information regarding the health status of the patient. Such a situation brings about a dilemma to the work of the counselor.
The alcoholism and drug abuse counselor are not required to enter into a professional relationship with their patients since by doing so; they may be jeopardized by the dual relationship plus it is unprofessional. The dilemma faced by the counselor is that being humans with feelings, they might be tempted or forced to start relationships with their patients. During the counseling session, the patient reveals a lot of private information to the counselor, and it is from this that they begin to know the patient better .In such a situation the counselor may find it hard not to become friends with the patient and which slowly grows into a relationship.
President Donald Trump, upon his first day in office, endorsed an executive order removing the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which indicated an end to their era of multi-national trade (Solís, 2017). The implications of the US withdrawal from the TPP have both political and economic repercussions for countries other than the US and Australia. The ‘Trump’ administration’s rationale for withdrawing from the TPP is aimed at improving the domestic efficiency and competitiveness, at the expense of growth and international trade (Hargreaves & Wild, 2016).
The Trump administration is fostering a liberalistic supply-side ideology by increasing deregulation and reducing corporate and labour taxes, whereby the main beneficiaries are the fossil fuel producers (lower barriers for responsible energy production) and the labour markets (Hargreaves & Wild, 2016). However, the withdrawal from the TPP will have the negative economic effects in the long run, by lowering, productivity, competition and eventually raising the prices for domestic consumers and additionally increase government debt due to the lower taxation aimed to be imposed in conjunction with Trump’s commitment to increase government spending on infrastructure (Hargreaves & Wild, 2016). The reliance on domestic supply will lower the demand for Australian exports in terms of commodities, education and tourism and may create political tensions between the countries.
The challenge for Australia, will be to examine new trade opportunities and in time the US could possibly be an attractive place to invest due to the new policies intended at increasing domestic supply of products and services (Ibrahim, 2017) This essay aims to critically analyse the implications of the United States withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has on Australia. Whether along the spectrum it would be detrimental or beneficial to Australia in the long and short run (Brock 2012).
The Trans-Pacific Partnership was the world’s largest regional trade agreement which accounted for approximately 40% of the global economy and spanning over four continents (Bye, 2017). The agreement involved 12 nations and Australia joined the negotiations in 2008, and the objective of the agreement was to eliminate more than 98% of tariffs and create a distinct set of trade and investment rules between the members to stimulate additional trade (Bye, 2017). The TPP covered exports from Australia which included beef, dairy, grains, sugar, horticulture, seafood, wine, resources and energy, manufactured goods, and even addressed the issues of modern trade and investment with regards to competitive and e-commerce to deliver fair competition between private and state-owned businesses (Bye, 2017).
A prominent economic concern for Australia, is the trade that Australian businesses forego as according to the Australian Sugar Industry Alliance, the TPP allowed Australian producers to export an additional 75% more sugar to the US, than the current limit which produced over $13 million in revenue per year for Australian farmers (Chang, 2017). In addition to this, they would also be able to provide 23 per cent of any extra raw sugar allocations in the US, and the TPP also removed an in-quota tariff worth about $3 million a year to Australia. In the event America withdrawals from TPP, it would mean that Australia’s trade deals would fall apart hence leading to its producers to lose out (Solís, 2017).
Besides this, Australia’s pork sector was set to benefit from the removal of tariffs in markets like Mexico, a huge pork-importing nation. Cheese makers in Australia’s were set to benefit from reduced tariffs to Japan and enhanced access to America (Cheong, and Tongzon 2013, p, 150). The Business Council of Australia pointed out that the removal of barriers and costs to doing business globally would aid in creating new employment opportunities. They also pointed out that 70% of Australia’s exports flow to TPP nations and the withdraw of US from TPP would bad for Australia’s economy (Marek Wąsiński, 2017, p, 70). The Peterson Institute’s modelling approximated that the TPP would have resulted to US$15 billion permanent growth in Australia’s real GDP but the withdrawal of US from the deal would mean that this aspect would only become a dream that was never realized (Baldwin, 2012, p, 1457).
The withdraw of US from TPP offers an opportunity for Australia in that reports have it that China is seeking to be involved/join TPP (Olorunnipa, 2017). This would enable Australia and other members of TPP to establish new trade policy hence ensuring that they do not suffer greatly economically. The entry of China and other interested parties would make it possible for better terms to be renegotiated hence enabling there to be Political and Economic arguments for free-market and government intervention. This would ensure every member benefits from doing business with each without any obstacles (Brown, 2017, p, 520).
The other opportunity would be for other member countries to seek for regional economic integration (Petri and Plummer, 2012, p, 16). Regional economic integration would entail Australia and other members of TPP promoting free and fair trade on a regional basis. The Member nations would eliminate trade barriers between amongst themselves, but each members is free to independently determine trade policies with other non-member countries (Ibrahim, 2017). This scenario is similar to a joint venture whereby firms come together to pursue a common goal, reduce competition/risk among them and ensure each partner benefits from the joint venture.
Australia has the opportunity of using its competitive advantage when seeking to enter into trade partnership with nations. Australia would benefit from using the Porter’s Diamond of Competitive Advantage and which involves nations using their competitive advantage like technology, resources, and skilled labour to serve as catalysts to enhance their position the regional competitive economic environment (Hill, & Hult, 2017). For example, Australia’s pork sector was set to benefit from the removal of tariffs in markets like Mexico and which is a huge pork-importing nation. Australia would seek establish better trade deals (pork) with Mexico and which would ensure that its economic does not suffer (Capling, and Ravenhill 2016, p, 559).
From the above information, it can be concluded that the TPP played an important role in the economic growth of Australia. However, with the withdrawal of US from the trade agreement, Australia is bound to suffer economically. However, the withdrawal of US offers numerous opportunities like focusing on doing trade partnerships with China with China which has showed interest in joining TPP. The other opportunities entail renegotiating trade agreements with other nations more so in areas where it has some economic advantages or blesses with resources that its partners does not have. ‘Trump’ administration’s reasons for withdrawing from the TPP is based on attempting to enhance domestic efficiency and competitiveness, at the expense of growth and international trade.